Investigation of G20 death 'cover-up' would be inappropriate, family told | guardian.co.uk

'There is nothing we can say to reverse the situation,' Met police watchdog tells relatives

Ian Tomlinson's widow Julia and his son Paul

Ian Tomlinson's widow Julia and his son Paul. Photograph: David Mansell/Guardian

The family of Ian Tomlinson, the man who died at the G20 protest after being attacked by the police, has been told it would be "inappropriate" for an official watchdog to consider whether officers were involved in a cover-up.

Five members of Tomlinson's family, including his wife, Julia, attended a public meeting at London's City Hall today to complain that events surrounding his death were being ignored by officials.

They told the civil liberties panel of the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), which is conducting an inquiry into the protests, that police tried to "cover up" police involvement in his death, an aspect of the controversy which they feel has been ignored.

Tomlinson, 47, collapsed and died near the Bank of England on 1 April, minutes after a member of the Met's territorial support group struck him with a baton and pushed him to the ground. The newspaper vendor, who was walking home from work when he was attacked from behind, also received suspected dog bites to his legs.

"We hope your report will look into whether police tried to cover up our father's death," Tomlinson's son, Richard King, told the panel. "We feel we were led down the garden path. We do feel it was a cover-up from the beginning. He [was struck] in front of 18 officers. Not one of the officers came forward to say they witnessed what happened. Not one of the officers went to give him first aid. Not one of the officers went to help him off the floor."

His brother, Paul King, added: "There have been four inquiries into the demonstrations and the policing of G20 and we want to know why the dog that bit Ian, the baton strike and the push to the floor have not been mentioned. He was an innocent man on his way home. We have lost our dad."

However, Victoria Borwick, the Conservative chair of the panel, told the family that she believed it would be "inappropriate" for the MPA – the body responsible for holding the force to account – to take up their concerns. "There is nothing any of us can say to reverse the situation of what happened last April," she added. "We are extremely sorry."

After the meeting, Borwick said she meant to say her committee would take legal advice on whether it could investigate the alleged cover-up.

Within 24 hours of Tomlinson's death, police became aware that their officers may have been involved in a physical altercation with him. However, in public, police refused to confirm there had been contact and resisted calls for an independent investigation until five days later, when the Guardian revealed video footage of the incident.

The officer who struck Tomlinson was suspended from duty on full pay. The Crown Prosecution Service has indicated it will decide whether to charge him with Tomlinson's manslaughter in the next two months. An inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) into complaints the Met and City of London deliberately misled the public about Tomlinson's death has yet to conclude.

Among several reports into the policing of the G20 demonstrations has been a report from the Met, two parliamentary inquiries and an official review by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary, the national watchdog. All have made just glancing references to Tomlinson's death, claiming they cannot prejudice the investigation into his death.

However Tomlinson's family point out that concerns which are separate from the criminal investigation into what caused his death – such as their belief they were "deliberately misled" by police – have not been addressed.

When an initial postmortem found Tomlinson died of a heart attack, the family were not told that the pathologist also found large amounts of blood in his stomach, bruising on his body and bites on his leg. Instead, they were told by police at an early stage that witnesses had seen him "run out of batteries". A second postmortem found he died of internal bleeding.

 

Noted steampunk arrested for tweeting G20 demonstration | Boing Boing

Noted steampunk arrested for tweeting G20 demonstration

Margaret Killjoy from Steampunk Magazine writes, "One of the founders of modern steampunk thought, Professor Calamity, is facing multiple felony charges after having been accused of running a twitter account that communicated with protesters during the G-20 protests in Pittsburgh last month. To add insult to injury, they raided his house in Queens, confiscating everything from hammers to copies of SteamPunk Magazine."

EFF has all the court documents on this.

We put our hands out where they could see them. They ordered us out of bed. They wouldn't let us dress, but they did put a random assortment of clothes on some people. We were handcuffed, and although the upstairs and downstairs groups were kept separate initially, we were soon all together, sitting in the living room, positioned like dolls on the couches and chairs. We were in handcuffs for several hours, and we were helpless as our little bird, a Finch we had rescued and were rehabilitating, flew out the open door to certain death, after his cage had been battered by the cops in their zeal to open the upstairs bedroom doors by force. We shouted at them, but they stood there and watched.

And they stood and watched us for hours and hours and hours. 16 hours to be precise, 16 hours of the NYPD and FBI traipsing through our house, confiscating our lives in a fishing expedition related to the G20 protests of September 24th and 25th. The search warrant, when we were finally allowed to read it, mentioned violation of federal rioting laws and was vague enough to allow the entire house to be searched. They kept repeating that we were not arrested, that we were free to go. But being free meant being watched by the FBI, monitored while using the bathroom, not allowed to make phone calls for hours or to observe them ransacking our rooms. Being free meant they took two of us away on bullshit summonses, and even though this was our house, where we lived, if we left, we could not re-enter.

FBI arrest man for tweeting | guardian.co.uk

New York man accused of using Twitter to direct protesters during G20 summit

Elliott Madison arrested by FBI and charged with using social networking site to help demonstrators evade Pittsburgh police

G20 Pittsburgh protest

About 5,000 protesters are estimated to have taken part in demonstrations in Pittsburgh during the G20 summit. Photograph: Brian Blanco/EPA

 

A New York-based anarchist has been arrested by the FBI and charged with hindering prosecution after he allegedly used the social networking site Twitter to help protesters at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh evade the police.

Elliot Madison, 41, from Queens, had his home raided and was put on $30,000 (£19,000) bail after he and Michael Wallschlaeger, 46, were tracked to the Carefree Inn motel in Pittsburgh during the summit on 24 and 25 September.

The pair were found sitting in front of a bank of laptops and emergency frequency radio scanners. They were wearing headphones and microphones and had many maps and contact numbers in the room.

Official police documents allege the two men used Twitter messages to contact protesters at the summit "and to inform the protesters and groups of the movements and actions of law enforcement".

In all, almost 200 protesters were arrested during the two-day summit, which brought world leaders to Pittsburgh to discuss the global economic meltdown and other matters of common financial interest.

About 5,000 protesters were estimated to have taken part in demonstrations in the city.

Twitter has rapidly established itself as an important tool in the armoury of protest groups and demonstrators. During the summit, the police openly monitored Twitter to listen in to the protesters' communications.

The FBI said that as well as the computers and radio scanning equipment discovered at the motel, they also confiscated from Madison's home 11 gas masks, five pairs of goggles and test tubes and beakers. They said they also took away anarchist books and pictures of Marx and Lenin.

Madison is a social worker with a Manhattan-based programme attached to a psychiatric hospital. He is said to be a member of the People's Law Collective, a voluntary group that advises protesters on legal issues arising from actions. Wallschlaeger produces a talk show on radio called This Week in Radical History.

 

Police riot notebooks reveal brutal use of shields against G20 protesters | The Observer

G20 April Fools Day Protest

Police in riot gear use their batons against demonstrators as they clash near the Bank of England in the City of London during the G20 protests. Photograph: Andrew Winning/Reuters

Police officers' notebooks lodged at the high court tell how they punched people in the face and beat others with riot shields during the G20 demonstrations in April.

The notebooks, which have been lodged as evidence in an action brought by three protesters, also disclose how Metropolitan police were given no restrictions on the use of force when they were ordered to move protesters attending the Climate Change camp in the City of London on 1 April. The accounts were written up the day after the demonstrations.

In one notebook, a police constable recounts how when he saw a protester pushing against officers' shields: "I punched him in the jaw and he moved backwards."

Another officer describes how he hit people with "shield strikes both flat and angled. I also delivered open palm strikes to a number of individuals and fist strikes as well."

A third constable logged: "To get the protesters who would not move, I needed to hit the flat part of my shield to get them to move back. I also used open-handed palm strikes. Once the protesters were moved back to the required distance, we remained in a closed cordon until relieved."

During the demonstration a newspaper vendor, Ian Tomlinson, died after a confrontation with police.

The logbook revelations are included in court documents lodged in a legal challenge by solicitors Bindmans against the Met brought on behalf of three Climate Camp protesters, criticising the use of "kettling", the controversial police tactic of forcibly containing a potentially disruptive crowd, as "unlawful" and unjustified.

Other Scotland Yard documents include the logbook of the officer in charge of policing the Climate Camp. It reveals that the decision to "kettle" was taken just moments after Chief Superintendent Michael Johnson, the "Bronze" commander responsible for the day's tactical decisions, was informed there was a "party atmosphere" among the crowd.

The police logs state that, at 6.12pm, Bronze command received information, possibly from an undercover informant in the Climate Camp, that there was a "party atmosphere. No issues."

Five minutes later – at 6.17pm – the log suggests that a decision to "kettle" was taken, with actual containment commencing at 7.07pm.

Moments before the kettle was brought into operation – at 7.04pm – lines of police officers begin advancing into Bishopsgate, where the Climate Camp was sited, and shields were used to push back protesters. The police log, however, does not comment on the levels of force that were to be used by officers to force back the demonstrators.

An account in a police constable's notebook states: "We were directed to push back the Climate Change protesters approximately 20-30 metres beyond two alleyways … I used my round shield to push back the crowd, which was 15 people deep."

Frances Wright, a member of the Climate Camp's legal team, said: "Having read all the documents that the police have disclosed so far, I still don't know who ordered force to be used at 7pm or why it was needed.

"The violence that Ian Tomlinson experienced was not an isolated example and the result of a few bad apples, as the police would like us to believe. An attitudinal change is needed."

Christopher Abbot, 30, from Reading, who described how his girlfriend was injured after being dragged by officers outside the police cordon during the Climate Camp and then shoved back into the crowd, is one of the complainants.

Despite his girlfriend "requiring urgent medication", it is claimed that officers refused to let her leave to receive treatment. It was not until after 11.15pm that she was allowed to leave the cordon, by which time she had "collapsed".

The disclosure of such sensitive material comes as Climate Camp organisers are set to unveil a new protest site at an undisclosed location in London this week.

In an attempt to counter unease over heavy-handed policing, Assistant Commissioner Chris Allison will unveil a new "softly, softly" strategy on Thursday for dealing with public protests following widespread criticism in the wake of the G20 protests.

A report by the police inspectorate recently condemned Scotland Yard's operation during the G20 rally as "inadequate" and belonging to a "different era".

Earlier this month, the Independent Police Complaints Commission criticised officers for pushing a 23-year-old woman with riot shields. She was already bleeding heavily and may have suffered a miscarriage as a result. The woman was also detained in the Climate Camp "kettle" and prevented from receiving medical attention for up to five hours.

John Halford, a human rights specialist at Bindmans, said it was telling that none of the constables' logbooks mentioned any early release arrangements for protesters who were ill or injured.

The other two claimants are Hannah McClure, 21, who claims that riot officers pushed her with shields, and Joshua Moos, 21, who says he was hit by police despite holding his hands behind his back to demonstrate that he was a peaceful protester.

Halford said: "Most chilling of all is the absence of a single recorded instruction to those officers about when they could use force and what would be reasonable, given this was a peaceful demonstration.

"In the absence of such instructions, many officers apparently behaved as if they had been unleashed on a rioting mob. If they were instructed to use violence in the way they did, that was unlawful. But the failure to prevent this from happening was an equally serious dereliction of their senior officers' duties."

A Met spokesman said: "Every officer is accountable under law and fully aware of the scrutiny that his action can be held open to. The decision to use force is made by the individual police officer, and he must account for that."

He added that the use of "kettling" was a "recognised tactic in public order policing".